Good for overall health: As with all forms of physical exercise, badminton can reduce or eliminate your risk for many health problems, such as high blood pressure, diabetes and obesity. Invented in India in a version called poona. British army officers learned the game about In the duke of Beaufort introduced the sport at his country estate, Badminton, from which the game derives its name.
Begin typing your search term above and press enter to search. Press ESC to cancel. Skip to content Home Essay What is the difference between contribution and achievement? Ben Davis May 7, What is the difference between contribution and achievement? What is your achievement in your company? How do I write my contributions? What contribution means? Why is contribution important? What are positive contributions? What is the importance of contribution?
What is the importance of contribution of natural and physical science? What does contributions to society mean? What is the importance or contribution of education?
What is the contribution of education to the society? What is the important contribution of sports? What is importance and contribution of sports? What is the importance of contribution of arts and design? Are student athletes more successful?
What are the advantages of combative sports? What is the advantage and disadvantage of badminton? Is Badminton good for health? What is badminton good for? What is the main goal of badminton? What are the 6 basic skills in badminton? Who is the father of badminton? What is the old name of badminton?
The vast majority of participants wrote about the importance of having interesting, stimulating work that gave them a sense of pleasure, pride and even joy.
Constructing careers in which it was possible to have the freedom and autonomy to pursue work that mattered was an achievement in itself.
The women we spoke to took great pleasure in the quality of their work, whether that meant pride in the elegance and clarity of a piece of research or reorganising an administrative system in a way that actively contributed to the effectiveness of a department.
Work was particularly prized if it demonstrated a creativity that took people or ideas to the next level and raised the standard of what was possible. If they got external recognition, these achievements became even more tangible and helped to build self-confidence.
There was an awareness of the world beyond Cambridge, and many people talked about wanting to connect, using everything from blogging, lecturing and conferences, through to the more conventional route of publication. Participants talked about becoming part of a wider intellectual or professional community, which then became a source of support, acknowledgement and stimulation. It was clear that they had an appetite to keep learning and developing throughout their careers.
Many of them found that it gave them a clear sense of purpose and was fundamental to their sense of who they were. Whilst work was rarely pursued to the exclusion of all else, it was nonetheless a central part of their existence.
Some people talked about putting their heart and soul into their work, and also described the often gruelling journey they had undertaken to achieve a particular outcome. The appetite to make a tangible impact through their work was clearly discernible. Inevitably, the type of impact participants were able to achieve varied considerably, depending on their specific areas of expertise, their seniority and the scope of their role. Some participants took simple pleasure in the incremental improvements that were the fabric of their daily work, or in the persistent effort necessary to land vital grants and donations.
Others pointed to keynote moments such as coordinating the press conference for a Nobel Prize winner from the University, or securing a medical breakthrough that would help to address a life-threatening illness.
Several participants talked about taking pride in having changed their field with a particular discovery, but they did so with no more or less pride than those in service or support roles who helped to create the conditions for such a breakthrough, for example by ensuring a lab was safe and fully resourced. The vast majority of participants had a healthy interest in securing acknowledgement for their efforts, particularly if it came from individuals or institutions that they themselves rated.
In contrast, little value was attached to being able to secure the corner office or a larger desk with each new job. Promotion was an important marker of success for many, although it was more noticeable as a theme amongst academics than non-academics.
Getting a professional qualification, degree or doctorate was clearly valued by both academics and non-academics. This was even more the case when it had been achieved whilst under significant pressure, perhaps as a result of studying as a part-time or mature student.
For some there was a sense of achieving second time around, perhaps after a less successful first degree, requalifying for a new career or after having left school early. For many it was important to be acknowledged within their professional sphere beyond Cambridge. As well as the obvious indicator of being widely published, such acknowledgement could take the form of fellowships, prizes and medals, or becoming chair of an influential body outside the University.
Additional sheen was added if they were the first or one of very few women to have secured such recognition. Participants would not view themselves as an overall success if their achievements in the work sphere fundamentally undermined family life.
If they could see themselves as having integrated their work and home lives in a way that was broadly healthy and viable, then it was an achievement based on deeply held beliefs about what mattered most to them in life. They are my husband and children, pursuing the questions in science that excite me and being able to help others to do the same. Both were essential and needed to be integrated, rather than compartmentalised.
This is not to say that tension and tough choices were eradicated, but for the people who saw this as an area of personal achievement those choices were managed in a way that broadly worked. Compromises were made, and few if any of the participants espoused the idea that you could have everything you wanted all the time. Pragmatism, informed by a clear sense of what really mattered, was the order of the day. Being a good parent and grandparent was of paramount importance to many, as was maintaining enduring and mutually supportive partnerships.
Whilst family life took many different shapes, there remained a consistent message about how vital it was. Many people talked about family indirectly feeding into their achievements in the work sphere by bringing a greater focus or a different perspective. For those with children, seeing them thrive and turn out well was a source of great pride — although many were wary of claiming this as their own achievement. Several pointed to the basic accomplishment of surviving the sleepless nights and energy-depleted years that come with very young children, whilst others enjoyed the fact that their teenagers would still talk to them!
Being able to secure an education despite family obstacles or to hold down a job whilst coping with a relationship breakdown both counted as achievements in the family sphere. Achievement is not just about the happy, shiny things — it is also about withstanding tough times and challenging situations. Resilience demonstrated under pressure is perhaps the darker side of achievement, but is in many ways just as important as the more obvious markers of success.
No career is a seamless progression upwards, and many of the participants were able to process the inevitable bumps in the road in a positive way. There was pride in having withstood a range of setbacks, from failing to secure a particular promotion or having a grant application turned down through to conquering debilitating performance anxiety as a musician.
The capacity to pick oneself up, bounce back and carry on regardless was something that participants clearly valued in themselves and others. This was also evident amongst those who talked about forging a career whilst having a chronic illness or depression, or providing support to a family member who was experiencing difficulties. Navigating adversity seems to have had the effect of sweetening subsequent achievements.
There were individuals who seemed to thrive under arduous field conditions without running water or electricity, whilst others jumped into the unknown by taking a job in a different discipline or on a different continent.
There was an appetite to seek out situations that were scary because they offered the promise of new learning opportunities and excitement. To be a pioneer is also to take on the challenges associated with being the first, or one of a small number of trailblazers.
This pioneering spirit showed up in various ways, including being the first in their family or school to attend university, being the first woman in a particular post, being the lone woman round a corporate board table or defying expectations by succeeding despite a lack of formal qualifications. Being a pioneer was not exclusively linked to gender, but was often accentuated by the limited numbers of women in certain positions or subject areas.
Some women also became more conspicuous having had a non-linear or unusual career pattern, such as pursuing academia late in life, making a significant career change, returning to work after many years away or being a senior woman in a successful job share.
Visibility brings with it a degree of scrutiny. It brings a sense of being a role model whether you like it or not, simply based on the fact that your colleagues, both men and women, will be aware of what you do. Some of the women we spoke to were more at ease with this notion than others. At their best, role models provide evidence of what can be achieved, for example as a mother returning to work, a mature student, a woman in science or coming from a working-class background.
Some participants talked about wanting to set an example for their own children, or wanting to have a tangible impact by making a particular subject more accessible to a diverse range of students.
Many of the women at Cambridge expressed a sense of achievement when talking about the effective use of power and influence.
0コメント